tutaski.blogg.se

Microsoft visual studio review
Microsoft visual studio review








microsoft visual studio review microsoft visual studio review

It's a contradiction to create AI helpers that copy your code to "make it easy", while you want it to be an easy-to-use tool that displays complexity ONLY if you need to. Lots and lots of things you don't care about and things that you really miss never come. There are more and more features that the smaller company will never use, such as live share, the translation of uwp apps is VERY confusing, the windows forms design is terrible and doesn't fit right to HIDPI. The developer expects little cognitive overhead, expects to be able to hide repetitive boiler plate tasks when they don't need to be seen, expects it to be easy to internationalize the application. With each new version the tool becomes more complex, rather than cleaner. Microsoft's initiative to maintain the community version is very good. In an environment that becomes familiar with use, you have access to several built-in functions, plus a bunch of solutions (some paid or third-party) that deliver advanced design, development, source code protection, and publishing capabilities. VS seems to be moving in the direction of being harder rather than easier. Microsoft doesn't seem to understand that if you like the productivity of VB you will NEVER WANT the complexity of C#.

microsoft visual studio review

For example, you have a Xamarin that never really looks finished, with a third-rate xaml design, uwp that seems to repeatedly disconnect the IDE so that you need to recompile the project to make simple changes, and a total abandonment of Visual Basic. We use it daily to maintain systems in windows, web, uwp and apps. It was great, now I just think it's enough










Microsoft visual studio review